| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. PLEX option - "Activate on behalf of" - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Maruchan Ramen wrote: Donates Old Package of Ramen to OP How embarrassing. RAMEN consumed.
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.10.16 08:22:42
|
2. Remove immunity to cargo scanners from blockade runners - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The Justice wrote: Immunity for cargo scanners is a worthless and dangerous bonus. Thoughts? I love having this bonus. But, I'd trade it for the ability to fit a spectrum breaker to this class and DSTs. But some low volume hauls are very e...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.10.16 08:21:19
|
3. PLEX option - "Activate on behalf of" - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Thinking about the upcoming clone state changes and ways to motivate F2P to paid status... What about a way to apply a plex payment to someone's unpaid clone state? The idea being, instead of giving someone a plex (which may be subject to scams),...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.10.16 08:13:48
|
4. Fix the margin scam - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Piugattuk wrote: Seems that if there's no consequence for people placing orders that fail because the lack the funds, yet the information is withheld about who it is, if this game is about PVP and carebears have to accept risk when they undock ...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.10.04 04:44:42
|
5. SP rerolls with major point changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: Trying to guess what motivates the diverse group of people that make up the body of Eve players is a fool's errand. Why are so many players present "ideas" to change the game to how they want it framed as a business case for...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.10.01 05:41:20
|
6. SP rerolls with major point changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nevyn Auscent wrote: Yes, there is a drop in subscriptions.... Except it's only a maybe. Since all we know is there is a drop in revenue. 2015 reporting 2009 Reporting
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.10.01 04:43:25
|
7. SP rerolls with major point changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nevyn Auscent wrote: [quote=Bad Pennyy] P.S. That difference is 9 million, not 11 million, learn to maths. So yea, Citation fail on your part, those financial statements show nothing to support your argument. If you read through the state...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.10.01 04:11:56
|
8. SP rerolls with major point changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nevyn Auscent wrote: Citations needed. Drop off in online player count does not mean drop off in revenue. Drop in revenue does not always mean a dying game, it often leads to a leaner more focused company. 2015 Financial Statement here :
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.10.01 00:47:26
|
9. SP rerolls with major point changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: Bad Pennyy wrote: So I think you missed a few of my initial points. Human psychology is the issue. I think throwing all that out the window and allowing players to respec based on their current whims is a big mistake ...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.09.30 21:59:37
|
10. SP rerolls with major point changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Zhilia Mann wrote: I very much doubt that SP-related balancing caused much of a subscriber drop except possible in the case of Titan/Super rebalancing as those are largely tied to alt accounts dedicated to those ships in the first place. I f...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.09.29 17:02:27
|
11. SP rerolls with major point changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: When dreadnoughts were altered (drone capabilities were removed)... no skillpoints were refunded. When subapical ships were systemactically rebalanced... no skillpoints were refunded. When mining barges were altered a few ye...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.09.29 16:31:30
|
12. Hisec Ganking Roundtable Part 2 - Participant Request - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: Actually I do know the answer: zero. You won't be happy until non-consensual PvP is not possible in highsec. If that is the case, I can only say that you should consider whether a PvP sandbox game that features non-consensu...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.09.29 16:23:13
|
13. SP rerolls with major point changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Zan Shiro wrote: Bad Pennyy wrote: The element of Eve that is different from other games is that the playstyle constitutes a form of success or satisfaction with the game independent of specific outcomes. Invalidating prior choices without ...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.09.29 16:10:27
|
14. SP rerolls with major point changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
So I think you missed a few of my initial points. The Eve universe is *not* persistent. The big point changes are instances of lack of persistence. This change is a function of innovation. But that innovation often has a "zero sum" effect, it caus...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.09.29 15:48:15
|
15. Hisec Ganking Roundtable Part 2 - Participant Request - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: But regardless, the consequences for being a highsec criminal are extremely harsh, so harsh that most players (at least highsec residents used to their NPC-enforced safety) flat out refuse to ever commit a criminal act. Wh...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.09.29 14:51:44
|
16. SP rerolls with major point changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: No. Unless a skill is actually made useless (in which case CCP has refunded SP) you should have to keep it. You gained use of it before the change, and could still after. The Eve skill system is not like other games where you...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.09.29 14:29:33
|
17. SP rerolls with major point changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: could you have found a more long winded way to say this? Definitely, but I was afraid the trolls might miss out...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.09.29 03:18:09
|
18. SP rerolls with major point changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Christopher Mabata wrote: Good thing Injectors and Extractors are a thing now OP As in we literally already can reallocate SP at will and CCP has said that is how we should do it if were not satisfied with a change. However, the exchange ra...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.09.29 02:49:27
|
19. SP rerolls with major point changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I've been thinking about player attrition around major point changes. I would like to propose that major game changes (e.g. sov changes, jump changes, high sec standings, etc...) also be accompanied with the opportunity to reallocate SPs. Drastic...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.09.29 02:42:19
|
20. Hisec Ganking Roundtable Part 2 - Participant Request - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Ganking has no real disincentive. The overall consequence is marginal for the value generated (kb stats, etc.). A few thoughts: Increase the criminal flag timer, possibly in a way similar to jump fatigue (ie, on a sliding scale) for high sec att...
- by Bad Pennyy - at 2016.09.29 02:28:13
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |